Classroom in a STEM environment an opportunity for innovation

Article Sidebar

pdf (Castellano)

Main Article Content

Cristian Ferrada
Universidad de Los Lagos (Xile)
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2678-7334
Danilo Díaz-Levicoy
Universidad Católica del Maule (Xile)
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8371-7899
Eduardo Puraivan
Universidad de Viña del Mar (Xile)
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2134-8922

The STEAM (science, technology, engineering, arts, and math) class provides an appropriate space to support student inclusion and participation through the use of technology. This area not only facilitates the teaching work for the presentation of content, but also provides the student with multiple implementation tools related to technology for the development of various programs focused on the STEAM methodology. It seeks to establish an avant-garde, demonstrative learning environment, based on the simulation of virtual reality through the conditioning of learning environments that promote the development of skills in new generations, in order to resume scientific knowledge and careers framed in the technological advances. This initiative aims to promote and stimulate teaching and learning spaces that take place in a
In addition, to promote creativity in the search for expression on the arts, innovating and facing the needs of the future through the development of projects to work in and for the students themselves, exploring and solving problems through critical thinking, effective communication, efficient time management.

Keywords
STEAM Classroom, Innovation, Science, Experimentation

Article Details

How to Cite
Ferrada, Cristian et al. “Classroom in a STEM environment: an opportunity for innovation”. DIM: Didáctica, Innovación y Multimedia, 2022, no. 40, http://raco.cat/index.php/DIM/article/view/402812.
References
AGUIRRE, Juan., MOYANO, Edgar., POVEDA, Ramiro., y VACA, Valeria. (2020). STEAM como metodología activa de aprendizaje en la educación superior. Polo del Conocimiento: Revista científico-profesional, 5(8), 467-492.

ALSOLIMAN, Bard. (2018) The Utilization of Educational Robotics in Saudi Schools: Potentials and Barriers from the Perspective of Saudi Teachers. International Education Studies, 11(10), 105-111.

ALVAREZ, Aída. (2020). La inserción de la Matemática Interactiva en el Proyecto Pedagógico de Aula Despierta una Mirada hacia el Modelo STEAM. Social Innova Sciences, 1(4), 62-67.

AYDIN-GÜNBATAR, Sevgi. (2018). Designing a process to prevent apple’s browning: A STEM activity. Journal of Inquiry Based Activities, 8(2), 99–110.

BISSAKER, Kerry. (2014). Transforming STEM education in an innovative Australian school: The role of teachers’ and academics’ professional partnerships. Theory into Practice, 53(1), 55–63. http://doi:10.1080/00405841.2014.862124.

BLACKLEY, Susan., y HOWELL, Jennifer. (2015). A STEM Narrative: 15 Years in the Making. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(7), 101-112.

BONILLA-DEL-RIO, Mónica., AGUADED, José. (2018) La escuela en la era digital: smartphones, apps y programación en educación primaria y su repercusión en la competencia mediática del alumnado. Píxel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, (53), 151-163. http://dx.doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2018.i53.10

BURROWS, Andrea. y SLATER, Timothy. (2015). A proposed integrated STEM framework for contemporary teacher preparation. Teacher Education and Practice, 28(2/3), 318-330.

DUBAN, Nil., AYDOĞDU, Bulent., y KOLSUZ, Selcuk. (2018). STEAM implementations for elementary school students in Turkey. Journal of STEM Arts, Crafts, and Constructions, 3(2), 41-58.

ENGLISH, Lyn. (2016). STEM education K-12: perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1

FAN, Szu-Chun. y YU, Kuang. (2017): “How an integrative STEM curriculum can benefit students in engineering design practices”. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27(1), 107-129.
FUENTES, Mercedes., GONZALEZ, Juan. (2019) Evaluación inicial del diseño de unidades didácticas STEM gamificadas con TIC. Revista Electrónica De Tecnología Educativa, (70), 1-17.

GARDNER, M., y TILLOTSON, W. (2019). Interpreting integrated STEM: Sustaining pedagogical innovation within a public middle school context. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(7), 1283–300. http://doi:10.007/s10763-018-9927-6.

GHITIS, Tatiana., ALBA, John. (2014) Los robots llegan a las aulas. Revista Infancias Imágenes, 13(1), 143-147.

GONZALEZ-FERNANDEZ, María., FLORES-GONZALEZ, Yadira. y Munoz-Lopez, Claudia. (2021) Panorama de la robótica educativa a favor del aprendizaje STEAM. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 18(2), 2301. http://doi:0.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2021.v18.i2.2301

HAWKINS, Ian., RATAN. Rabindra., BLAIR, Denice. y FORDHAM. Joseph. (2019). The effects of gender role stereotypes in digital learning games on motivation for STEM achievement. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(6), 628–537. http://doi:10.1007/s10956-019-09792-w.

KIM, Beaumie, y BASTANI, Reyhaneh. (2017). Students as game designers: transdisciplinary approach to STEAM education. Alberta Science Education Journal, 45(1), 45-52.

LIM, Lim, ZHAO, Yoing., TONDEUR, Jo., CHAI, y TSAI, Ching. (2013). Bridging the gap: Technology trends and use of technology in schools. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 59-68.

MARTIN-HANSEN, Lisa. (2018). Examining ways to meaningfully support students in STEM. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 1-6.

MARTÍN-PÁEZ, Tobías., AGUILERA, David., PERALES-PALACIOS, Francisco. y VÍLCHEZ-GONZÁLEZ, José. (2019). What are we talking about when we talk about STEM education? A review of literature. Science Education, 103(4), 799-822.

MCDONALD, Christine. (2016). STEM education: A review of the contribution of the disciplines of science. Technology, Engineering and Mathematics. Science Education International, 27(4), 530–569.

OCDE. (2018). The future of education and skills. OCDE.

ORTIZ-REVILLA, Jairo., ADÚRIZ-BRAVO, Agustin. y GRECA, Ileana. (2020). A framework for epistemological discussion on integrated STEM education. Science & Education, 29, 857-880.

PARSON, Laura., y OZAKI, Ozaki. (2018). Gendered student ideals in STEM in higher education. NASPA. Journal about Women in Higher Education, 11(2), 171-190. http://doi:10.1080/19407882.2017.1392323

RAMÍREZ, Carlos., JIMÉNEZ-BUILES, Jovani. y QUINTERO, Diana. (2021). Ambiente visual integrado de desarrollo para el aprendizaje de programación en robótica/Comprehensive Visual Development Environment for Learning Robotics Programming. Revista Investigación e Innovación en Ingenierías, 9(1), 7-18.

ROEHRIG, Gillian., MOORE, Tamara., WANG, Hui. y PARK, Mi. (2012). Is adding the E enough? Investigating the impact of K12 engineering standards on the implementation of STEM integration. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 31–44. http://doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00112.x.

SÁNCHEZ, Enrique. (2019) La educación STEAM y la cultura “maker”. Journal of Parents and Teachers. (379), 45-51.

SANDERS, Mark. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20–36.

SATCHWELL, Richard. y LOEPP, Franzie. (2002). Designing and Implementing an Integrated Mathematics, Science, and Technology Curriculum for the Middle School. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 39(3), 41-66.

STRUYF, Annemie., DE-LOOF. Haydée., BOEVE-DEPAUW. Jelle., y PETEGEM, Peter. (2019). Students’ engagement in different STEM learning environments: Integrated STEM education as promising practice? International Journal of Science Education, 41(10), 1387–1407. http://doi:10.1080/09500693.2019.1607983.

TEO, Eee., y KE, Kaijie. (2014). Challenges in STEM teaching: Implication for preservice and inservice teacher education program. Theory into Practice, 53(1), 18–24. http://doi:10.1080/00405841.

TOMA, Radu. y GRECA, Ileana. (2018). The effect of integrative STEM instruction on elementary students’ attitudes toward science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics. Science and Technology Education, 14(4), 1383–1395.

TOMA, Radu., GRECA, Ileana. y MENESES-VILLAGRÁ, Jesús. (2017). Dificultades de maestros en formación inicial para diseñar unidades didácticas usando la metodología de indagación. Revista Eureka sobre enseñanza y divulgación de las ciencias, 14(2), 441-457.

YAKMAN. Georgette. y LEE, Hyonyong. (2012) Exploring the Exemplary STEAM Education in the U.S. as a Practical Educational Framework for Korea. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 6(32), 1072-1086.

STRUYF, Annemie., DE-LOOF. Haydée., BOEVE-DEPAUW. Jelle., y PETEGEM, Peter. (2019). Students’ engagement in different STEM learning environments: Integrated STEM education as promising practice? International Journal of Science Education, 41(10), 1387–1407. http://doi:10.1080/09500693.2019.1607983.

TEO, Eee., y KE, Kaijie. (2014). Challenges in STEM teaching: Implication for preservice and inservice teacher education program. Theory into Practice, 53(1), 18–24. http://doi:10.1080/00405841.

TOMA, Radu. y GRECA, Ileana. (2018). The effect of integrative STEM instruction on elementary students’ attitudes toward science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics. Science and Technology Education, 14(4), 1383–1395.

TOMA, Radu., GRECA, Ileana. y MENESES-VILLAGRÁ, Jesús. (2017). Dificultades de maestros en formación inicial para diseñar unidades didácticas usando la metodología de indagación. Revista Eureka sobre enseñanza y divulgación de las ciencias, 14(2), 441-457.

YAKMAN. Georgette. y LEE, Hyonyong. (2012) Exploring the Exemplary STEAM Education in the U.S. as a Practical Educational Framework for Korea. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 6(32), 1072-1086.